Orissa High Court
WP(C)/27282/2025 of PRASANT KUMAR BAYARI Vs THE REGIONAL MANAGER, JANA SMAL FINANCE BANK LTD, BBSR on 2 September 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.27282 of 2025 CNR No. ODHC010669082025 Prasant Kumar Bayari …. Petitioner None -versus- The Regional Manager, Jana Small Finance Bank Limited, Bhubaneswar and Another …. Opposite Parties Mr. Abhaya Kumar Sharma, Advocate CORAM:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.27282 of 2025
CNR No. ODHC010669082025
Prasant Kumar Bayari
….
Petitioner
None
-versus-
The Regional Manager, Jana
Small Finance Bank Limited,
Bhubaneswar and Another
….
Opposite Parties
Mr. Abhaya Kumar Sharma, Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE MR. K.R. MOHAPATRA
JUSTICE MR. MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Order No. 02.09.2026
01.
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. None appears for the Petitioner at the time of call.
3. Mr. Naresh Kumar Nayak, learned counsel on behalf of Mr. Swain, learned counsel for the Caveator is present.
4. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:-
“On the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the Petitioner therefore prayed that, this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit this Writ Petition, issue Rule Nisi, calling upon the Opposite Parties to show cause as to why the notice under section 14 (1) of SARFAESI Act, 2002 under Annexure-3 issued by the Opposite Party, Bank shall not be quashed declaring the same as illegal and arbitrary;
And as to why the Opposite Parties shall not be directed to settle the loan account of the Petitioner within a stipulated period as the Petitioner has repaid an amount of Rs. 13,52,825/- as EMI towards the loan Account No. 47929440000013 dated 21.12.2020 out of Rs. 18,00,000/- and to give reasonable time to the Petitioner for payment of the same;
And if the Opposite Parties failed to show cause and show insufficient and /or irrelevant cause, then make the said rule nisi absolute;
And Pass such other order/s, direction/s as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case;
And for this act of kindness the Petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.”
4. A memo of withdrawal at Flag-‘X’ seeking liberty to file better application has been filed by the Petitioner.
5. Since none appears for the Petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo)
Judge
Himansu
Digitally Signed Signed by: HIMANSU SEKHAR DASH Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 03-Sep-2026 13:15:47 Signature Not Verified