Orissa High Court
CRLMC/2934/2026 of ANADI CHARAN SAHOO Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 2 September 2026
of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMC No.2934 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010636452026 Anadi Charan Sahoo & Anr. ..... Petitioners Represented by Adv. - Umesh Chandra Mohanty -versus- State of Odisha ..... Opposite Party Represented by Adv. - Mr. D.K.Sahoo, A.G.A. CORAM: THE HON’BLE
Page 1 of 2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.2934 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010636452026
Anadi Charan Sahoo & Anr.
.....
Petitioners
Represented by Adv. -
Umesh Chandra
Mohanty
-versus-
State of Odisha
.....
Opposite Party
Represented by Adv. -
Mr. D.K.Sahoo, A.G.A.
CORAM:
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR
MOHAPATRA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
02.09.2026 Order No.
02.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners and learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State- Opposite Party. Perused the materials placed before this Court.
3. The Petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 23.02.2026 on which date the non-bailable warrant of arrest has been issued against them by the learned Special Judge, Vigilance, Bhubaneswar in T.R. Case No-26 of 2023. Learned counsel for the Petitioners submitted that initially the Petitioners were on bail on 31.10.2023, after which the Petitioners were appearing before the learned Court in seisin over the matter after they were released on bail. However, on one of the dates fixed for appearance, due to communication gap with their lawyer, the Petitioners were unable to appear since no step was taken to represent the Petitioners by the counsel appearing
Page 2 of 2. for them. Thereafter, a non-bailable warrant of arrest was issued against the Petitioners. It was further contended that for the laches on the part of the counsel, the party should not be allowed to suffer. Therefore, being aggrieved by such order the Petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to quash order dated 23.02.2026.
4. On perusal of the record, this Court is of the view that the trial court has not committed any illegality, however, in the larger interests of justice and in order to provide another opportunity to the Petitioners, this Court deems it proper to set aside the order dated 23.02.2026 by the learned Special Judge, Vigilance, Bhubaneswar in T.R. Case No-26 of 2023, subject to payment of a cost of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand) each by the Petitioners to the Advocates’ Welfare Fund of Local Bar Association within fifteen days and furnishing money receipt thereof in proof of deposit. Further, it is directed that the Petitioners shall appear before the learned Special Judge, Vigilance, Bhubaneswar within two weeks from today along with a copy of today’s order and shall continue to participate in the proceeding without any further default. In the event, the Petitioners make any further default in appearance, it is open to the Court in seisin over the matter to take necessary coercive steps against the Petitioners.
5. In such view of the matter, the CRLMC is allowed.
(A.K. Mohapatra)
Judge
Rubi
Digitally Signed Signed by: RUBI BEHERA Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 07-Sep-2026 11:59:37 Signature Not Verified