Orissa High Court

ABLAPL/7534/2026 of TULASI @ RANJITA JENA Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 2 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.7534 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010467502026 Tulasi @ Ranjita Jena …. Petitioner Mr. S. P. Barik, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. C. R. Swain, AGA Mr. S. N. Mishra 4, Advocate (Informant) CORAM: JUSTICE V.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No.7534 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010467502026

Tulasi @ Ranjita Jena

….

Petitioner

Mr. S. P. Barik, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha

….

Opposite Party

Mr. C. R. Swain, AGA

Mr. S. N. Mishra 4, Advocate

(Informant)

CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

02.09.2026

03. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G.R. Case No.605 of 2026 pending on the file of learned J.M.F.C., Basudevpur, arising out of Basudevpur P.S. Case No.326 of 2026 for commission of offences punishable under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 118(2) and 296 of BNS.

3. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for pre-arrest bail.

4. Taking into account the nature of allegations and the submissions of the learned counsel for the State on perusal of the Case Diary, that the injury suffered is simple in nature notwithstanding the objection of the learned counsel for the informant, this Court is persuaded to hold custodial interrogation of the Petitioner is not warranted. Hence, this Court directs that on surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, the Petitioner shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just and proper.

5. To allay the apprehension for the learned counsel for the informant of threat perception, it is directed that the Petitioner shall appear before the jurisdictional Police Station once a fortnight for the next two months at 11:30 a.m. on such date and time to be fixed by the learned Court in seisin till submission of final form and she shall not be detained beyond one hour. Certification of such appearance shall be submitted to the learned Court in seisin.

The Investigating Agency be alive to the fact that the Petitioner is a lady.

6. It is needless to state that the Petitioner shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation.

7. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of.

(V. NARASINGH)

Judge

Jina Digitally Signed Signed by: JINA DIGAL Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 03-Sep-2026 19:45:26 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead