Orissa High Court

ABLAPL/9987/2026 of LINGARAJ JENA Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 2 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 9987 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010634292026 Lingaraj Jena …. Petitioner Mr. S. Mishra, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. S.K. Lenka, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 02.09.2026 01. 1. Heard learned

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No. 9987 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010634292026

Lingaraj Jena

….

Petitioner

Mr. S. Mishra, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha

….

Opposite Party

Mr. S.K. Lenka, ASC

CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

02.09.2026

01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G.R. Case No.1040 of 2026, pending on the file of learned S.D.J.M., Khurda arising out Industrial Estate P.S. Case No.233 of 2026 for commission of offences punishable under Sections 303(2)/305(e)/3(5) of BNS, 2023 read with Section 51 of Odisha Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2016.

3. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for pre-arrest bail.

4. Taking into account the nature of allegations, it is directed that on surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, the Petitioner shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just and proper subject to verification of not more than two criminal antecedents of any nature.

5. If it comes to the fore that the Petitioner has more than two criminal antecedents of any nature, this order shall not be given effect to.

6. Additionally it is directed that the Petitioner shall appear before the jurisdictional police station on such date and time to be fixed by the learned Court in seisin for the next three months or till submission of final form whichever is earlier. Certification of such appearance shall be submitted to the learned Court in seisin.

7. It is needless to state that the Petitioner shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation.

8. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of. U.C.C. as per rules.

(V. NARASINGH)

Judge

Ayesha Digitally Signed Signed by: AYESHA ROUT Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 03-Sep-2026 20:56:04 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead