Orissa High Court
WP(C)/25453/2026 of AMRESH KUMAR NAYAK Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 2 September 2026
of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.25453 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010594282026 Amresh Kumar Nayak & another ..... Petitioners Represented by Adv. Mr. Bishnu Prasad Sarangi -versus- State of Odisha & Others ..... Opposite Parties Represented by Mr. D. Lenka, AGA CORAM: MR.
Page 1 of 2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C) No.25453 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010594282026
Amresh Kumar Nayak &
another
.....
Petitioners
Represented by Adv.
Mr. Bishnu Prasad
Sarangi
-versus-
State of Odisha & Others
.....
Opposite Parties
Represented by
Mr. D. Lenka, AGA
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
02.09.2026
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Addl. Government Advocate for the State.
3. The petitioners have approached this Court with the following prayer:- “The petitioner therefore most humbly prays that this Hon'ble Court would graciously be pleased to admit this writ petition, call for the records and after hearing the parties, allow the same by issuing a writ / writs in the nature of certiorari / mandamus declaring that the recording at ling at Col. No. 3 of the ROR (Annexure-1) as "Dakhal Satwa Sunya" status is also illegal, hence the Tahasildar, Bhubaneswar be directed to correct such entry in the ROR (Annexure-1) and issue Stitiban Patta to the petitioner in respect of the case land; And pass any other or further direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper;
Order No.
1. Page 2 of 2.
4. It is stated at the bar that the case of the petitioners is covered by the judgment rendered by this Court recently in the case of Gargi Dash v. State of Odisha & Others (W.P.(C) No.2870 of 2026) & Batch.
5. Considering the submissions as above, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Additional Tahasildar, Bhubaneswar to consider the prayer of the petitioners in light of the aforementioned judgment of this Court. A decision in this regard shall be taken within six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order by the petitioners.
(Sashikanta Mishra)
Judge
B.C.Tudu Digitally Signed Signed by: BHIGAL CHANDRA TUDU Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 02-Sep-2026 17:57:34 Signature Not Verified