Orissa High Court
BLAPL/6899/2026 of KURESA BIBI Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 2 September 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.6899 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010481542026 Kuresa Bibi … Petitioner Mr. A.K. Sahoo, Advocate -versus- State of Orissa … Opposite Party Mr. S.C. Pradhan, Addl. PP CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER(ORAL):02.09.2026 01. 1. This
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.6899 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010481542026
Kuresa Bibi
…
Petitioner
Mr. A.K. Sahoo, Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa
…
Opposite Party
Mr. S.C. Pradhan, Addl. PP
CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
Order No.
ORDER(ORAL):02.09.2026
01.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This is a bail application U/S.483 of BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Chhendipada PS Case No.291 of 2026 corresponding to CT Case (NDPS) No.33 of 2026 pending in the file of learned Special Judge, Angul for commission of offences punishable U/Ss.21(b)/29 of the NDPS Act, on the main allegation of dealing with Contraband article of Brown Sugar.
2. Heard, Mr. Akshaya Kumar Sahoo, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. S.C. Pradhan, learned Addl. PP in the matter and perused the record.
3. After having considered the rival submissions upon perusal of record, not only there appears allegation against the petitioner for dealing with Contraband article, but also she is allegedly involved in two other similar type of cases vide C.T.(NDPS) Case No. 19/2025 U/s. 21(b)/29 of NDPS Act and C.T.(NDPS) Case No.01/2026 U/s. 21(b)/29 of NDPS
Act. The trial is yet to commence. No doubt, co- accused has been granted bail, but the present Petitioner does not stand on similar footing inasmuch as the co-accused was suffering from Metastatic cancer and the present petitioner is having similar criminal antecedent. In the view of the aforesaid facts and circumstance and on consideration of the materials placed on record together with criminal proclivity the Petitioner for similar type of cases, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the Petitioner.
4. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands rejected. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. A soft copy of this order be immediately transmitted to the learned trial Court.
(G. Satapathy)
Judge Priyajit Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHASMITA SASMAL Designation: Sr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA Date: 02-Sep-2026 20:01:22 Signature Not Verified