Orissa High Court
RPFAM/164/2025 of ARNAYA KUMAR SAHOO Vs ARPITA SAHOO on 2 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK RPFAM No.164 of 2025 CNR No.ODHC010406922025 Arnaya Kumar Sahoo …. Petitioner Mrs. Sabita Behera, Advocate -versus- Arpita Sahoo …. Opposite Party Mr. B. Rout, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA Order No. ORDER 02.09.2026 08. This matter is
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RPFAM No.164 of 2025
CNR No.ODHC010406922025
Arnaya Kumar Sahoo
….
Petitioner
Mrs. Sabita Behera, Advocate
-versus-
Arpita Sahoo
….
Opposite Party
Mr. B. Rout, Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
02.09.2026
08. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Mrs. Sabita Behera, learned Counsel for the Petitioner prays for withdrawal of the revision petition and files a memo to the said effect in the Court, which is taken on record.
3. At this stage, learned Counsel for the Opposite Party, drawing attention of this Court to the order dated 20.08.2026 submits, vide the said order, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner was directed to take instruction regarding deposit of the entire arrear amount of maintenance payable to the Opposite Party-daughter. Instead of doing the needful, the Petitioner, intentionally, is withdrawing the revision petition to debar the minor daughter to get the maintenance.
4. At this stage, it would be apt to reproduce below paragraph No. 5 of the order dated 09.12.2025, the same being relevant for the present purpose.
“5. Hence, it is made clear that pendency of the present revision petition so also interim order, shall not be a bar for the learned Judge, Family Court, Kendrapara to proceed further in Criminal Execution Case No.32 of 2025.”
5. However, as the petitioner does not intend to pursue the revision petition, the same stands dismissed, as withdrawn.
6. In view of the said clarificatory order dated 09.12.2025 and dismissal of the present revision petition, this Court expects that the learned Judge, Family Court, Kendrapara shall do well to proceed further in Criminal Execution Case No.32 of 2025 in accordance with law and conclude the said proceeding at the earliest.
7. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.
8. Office is directed to communicate a copy of this order to the learned Judge, Family Court, Kendrapara for information and necessary action.
Prasant
(S. K. MISHRA) JUDGE
Digitally Signed Signed by: PRASANT KUMAR PRADHAN Designation: Secretary Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack. Date: 03-Sep-2026 16:50:34 Signature Not Verified