Orissa High Court

MACA/69/2010 of BHARATI DALAI Vs BRIJ MOHAN KHANDELWA on 2 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK MACA No.69 of 2010 CNR No. ODHC010012712010 Bharati Dalai & Ors. ..... Appellants Represented by Adv. - M/s.A.K.Choudhury -versus- Brij Mohan Khandelwa & Anr. ..... Respondents Represented by Adv. - CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA

Page 1 of 1.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

MACA No.69 of 2010

CNR No. ODHC010012712010

Bharati Dalai & Ors.

.....

Appellants

Represented by Adv. -

M/s.A.K.Choudhury

-versus-

Brij Mohan Khandelwa & Anr.

.....

Respondents

Represented by Adv. -

CORAM:

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR

MOHAPATRA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

02.09.2026 Order No.

05.

1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.

2. Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that he has no instructions in the matter.

3. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed due to non- prosecution.

(Aditya Kumar Mohapatra)

Judge

Rubi

Digitally Signed Signed by: RUBI BEHERA Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 07-Sep-2026 11:59:37 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead