Orissa High Court
WP(C)/28201/2026 of RATI RANJAN NAYAK Vs ODISHA STATE CO-OPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS FEDERATION LTD., BHUBANESWAR on 2 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.28201 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010648252026 Rati Ranjan Nayak …. Petitioner Mr. S. K. Mishra, Advocate -versus- Odisha State Co-operative Milk Producers Federation Ltd., Bhubaneswar & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Panda, ASC CORAM:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.28201 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010648252026
Rati Ranjan Nayak
….
Petitioner
Mr. S. K. Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
Odisha State Co-operative
Milk Producers
Federation Ltd.,
Bhubaneswar & Ors.
….
Opposite Parties
Mr. P.K. Panda, ASC
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
02.09.2026
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties.
3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “Under the above circumstances, it is therefore humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be graciously pleased to direct the Opp. Parties to appoint the petitioner under the Rehabilitation Assistant scheme and to grant him all consequential service and financial benefits to save the petitioner and his family from further suffering; And/or pas any other appropriate writ/writs, order/orders and direction/directions in the fitness of the case.
And for this act of kindness as in duty bound the petitioner shall ever pray.”.
// 2 //
4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that application made by the Petitioner vide Annexure-4 to get the benefit of appointment under the R.A. Scheme, though is pending before Opposite Party No.2, but no decision is being taken on the same.
5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.2 to consider the application filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-4 within a period of three (3) months from the date of production of certified copy of this order with due communication to the Petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Subrat
Judge Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBRAT KUMAR BARIK Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 03-Sep-2026 11:15:49 Signature Not Verified