Orissa High Court
BLAPL/6757/2026 of SANJAYA MAHATO @ LALU @ SANJAY KUMAR MAHATO Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 2 September 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.6757 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010487392026 Sanjaya Mahato @ Lalu @ Sanjay Kumar Mahato … Petitioner Mr. U. Barik, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha … Opposite Party Mr. R.B. Mishra, Addl. PP CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.6757 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010487392026
Sanjaya Mahato @ Lalu @
Sanjay Kumar Mahato
…
Petitioner
Mr. U. Barik, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…
Opposite Party
Mr. R.B. Mishra, Addl. PP
CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
Order No.
ORDER(ORAL)02.09.2026
01.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This is a bail application U/S.483 of BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Bisra PS Case No.10 of 2013 corresponding to ST Case No.132/2 of 2013-14 pending in the file of learned Ad- hoc Addl. District and Sessions Judge, (FTSC), (POCSO), Rourkela for commission of offences punishable U/Ss. 302/376 of the IPC.
2. Heard, Mr. Umakanta Barik, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. R.B. Mishra, learned Additional Public Prosecutor in the present matter and perused the record.
3. Admittedly, this is a bail jump case, but the petitioner was earlier on bail, however, the NBWA was issued against the petitioner on 10.04.2025 when the accused did not appear and no step was taken on his behalf, but the petitioner was taken into custody on 23.04.2026 on the strength of NBWA and thereby, the petitioner must have felt the rigor of law by remaining in custody for flouting the orders of the Court. In the aforesaid circumstances, this Court by taking a lenient view admits the petitioner to bail.
4. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands allowed and the petitioner is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) only with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper with following condition:-
(i) the petitioner in the course of trial shall attend the trial Court on each date of posting without fail unless his attendance is dispensed with. In case the Petitioner fails without sufficient cause to appear in the Court in accordance with the terms of the bail, the learned trial Court may proceed against the Petitioner for offence U/S.269 of BNS, 2023 in accordance with law.
5. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules. A soft copy of this order be immediately communicated to the concerned Court, who shall afterwards communicate the same to the concerned Jail through e- mail for reference.
(G. Satapathy)
Judge
Priyajit
Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHASMITA SASMAL Designation: Sr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA Date: 02-Sep-2026 20:01:21 Signature Not Verified