Orissa High Court

WP(C)/16912/2024 of MINATI DASH Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 1 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 16912 of 2024 CNR No. ODHC010470132024 Minati Dash ..... Petitioner Mr. K.C. Kar, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. A . Tripathy, AGA CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER

Page 1 of 2.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WP(C) No. 16912 of 2024

CNR No. ODHC010470132024

Minati Dash

.....

Petitioner

Mr. K.C. Kar, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha & Ors.

.....

Opposite Parties

Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

01.09.2026 Order No.05

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties.

3. It is fairly contended that during pendency of the writ petition, Opp. Party No. 5 has already been disengaged by the BDO, Delanga-Opp. Party No. 4. But on the face of such disengagement of Opp. Party No. 5, Petitioner is not being given engagement in her place. It is accordingly contended that Opp. Party No. 4 be directed to provide engagement to the Petitioner as she is otherwise eligible.

4. Learned Addl. Govt. Advocate on the other hand contended that if as contended Opp. Party No. 5 has been disengaged in the meantime, Petitioner has to make her grievance before Opp. Party No. 4 to get the benefit of engagement in place of Opp. Party No. 5.

5. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties and considering the submission made, this Court while disposing the writ petition, permits the Petitioner move an application before

Page 2 of 2. Opp. Party No. 4 by ventilating her grievance within a period of two (2) weeks hence.

5.1. It is observed that, if any such application is moved before Opp. Party No. 4 within the aforesaid time period, the said Opp. Party shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a further period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of such application with due communication to the Petitioner.

6. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of.

(BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY)

Judge Sneha Digitally Signed Signed by: SNEHANJALI PARIDA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 03-Sep-2026 13:12:14 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead