Orissa High Court
BLAPL/5500/2026 of BRUSABHANU SINGH @ SING Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 1 September 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.5500 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010400292026 Brusabhanu Singh @ Sing … Petitioner Mr.R.K.Mahapatra, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha … Opposite Party Mr. P.Satapathy, Addl. PP CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER(ORAL) 01.09.2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.5500 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010400292026
Brusabhanu Singh @ Sing
…
Petitioner
Mr.R.K.Mahapatra, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…
Opposite Party
Mr. P.Satapathy, Addl. PP
CORAM:
JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
Order No.
ORDER(ORAL)
01.09.2026
02.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This is a bail application U/S.483 of BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Bheden PS Case No.32 of 2025 corresponding to CT Case No. 84/44 of 2025 (Arising out of CT Case No.34 of 2025) pending in the file of learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Bargarh, for commission of offences punishable U/S.103(1) of BNS, on the main allegation of committing murder of the deceased Prabhati Pradhan by running over her by the Tractor having cage wheels.
2. In the course of hearing, Mr.Rajesh Kumar Mahapatra, learned counsel for the petitioner by relying upon the deposition of PWs. 1 & 2 submits that PWs. 1 & 2 although are eye witnesses to the occurrence, but they have not supported the prosecution allegation and the petitioner being detained in custody since last one and half year, he may kindly be granted bail.
2.1. On the other hand, Mr.P.Satapathy, learned Addl. PP by placing the statement of Madhusudan Rao, Laxmi Pradhan & Paresh Bag submits that not only PWs. 1 & 2 are the eye witnesses to the occurrence, but also these three witnesses are eye witnesses to the occurrence and they are yet to be examined and, therefore, the bail application of the petitioner may kindly be rejected.
3. After having considered the rival submissions upon perusal of record, not only there appears allegation against the petitioner for committing murder of the deceased, but this Court has also rejected the bail application of the petitioner in BLAPL No. 13827 of 2025 by considering the statement of so-called eye witnesses, however, on perusal of record, it appears that there are other eye witnesses to the occurrence who are yet to be examined. In the circumstance, this Court hardly finds any change in circumstance to consider the bail application of the petitioner afresh.
4. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands rejected. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. A copy of this order be communicated to the learned trial Court.
(G. Satapathy)
Judge kishore Digitally Signed Signed by: KISHORE KUMAR SAHOO Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 01-Sep-2026 18:48:29 Signature Not Verified