Orissa High Court
WP(C)/14762/2026 of SANDHYARANI TRIPATHY Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 1 September 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.14762 of 2026 CNR No.ODHC010344762026 Sandhyarani Tripathy & Ors. …. Petitioners Mr. Trilochan Das, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opp. Parties Mr. Jayant Kumar Bal, AGA CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.14762 of 2026
CNR No.ODHC010344762026
Sandhyarani Tripathy & Ors.
….
Petitioners
Mr. Trilochan Das, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors.
….
Opp. Parties
Mr. Jayant Kumar Bal, AGA
CORAM:
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
01.09.2026
01.
1. Heard learned counsel for both the Parties.
2. By means of this Application, the Petitioners seek the indulgence of this Court for a direction to the Opposite Parties to consider their promotional prospects similar to that of the candidates who have since been promoted under the merit list, where the names of the Petitioners found reflected in Serial Nos.60, 111, 141 & 159.
3. In course of the hearing in the Application, learned counsel for the Petitioners, on a query by the Court, failed to substantiate the fact with regard to any grievance having been submitted to the Authority for consideration of the promotional prospects. It is submitted that while the Petitioners have been given all other consequential benefits as would have accrued to them pursuant to their initial appointment with effect from the year 2011, the promotional prospect have not been considered.
4. In view of the submission made above, and in absence of any serious objection from the side of Mr. Bal, learned Additional Government Advocate (AGA), the Petitioners are at liberty to move the Authority with a representation for consideration of the grievance as regards the promotional prospects within a period of one (02) months. In the event, any such representation is made to the Authority; the same shall be considered in accordance with law within the period as above and to communicate the result thereof within two (02) weeks thereafter.
5. It is made clear that the Court has not passed any opinion on the merit of the Application.
(Chittaranjan Dash) Judge
Priyanka Digitally Signed Signed by: PRIYANKA BARIK Designation: JUNIOR STENOGRAPHER Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 02-Sep-2026 15:07:33 Signature Not Verified