Orissa High Court
WP(C)/27825/2026 of PUSPALATA SAHOO Vs AUTHORIZED OFFICER, YES BANK, KOLKATA on 1 September 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.27825 of 2026 ODHC010668152026 Puspalata Sahoo …. Petitioner Mr. Amlan Shakti Paul, Advocate -versus- Authorised Officer, Yes Bank, Kolkata & Others …. Opp. Parties Mr. Anjan Kumar Biswal, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MR.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.27825 of 2026
ODHC010668152026
Puspalata Sahoo
….
Petitioner
Mr. Amlan Shakti Paul, Advocate
-versus-
Authorised Officer, Yes Bank,
Kolkata & Others
….
Opp. Parties
Mr. Anjan Kumar Biswal, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
01.09.2026 Order No.
01.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. Petitioner, in this Writ Petition, prays for the following reliefs:
“It is, therefore, humbly, prayed that Your Lordships would be graciously pleased to admit the Writ Petition, issue notice to the opposite parties, after hearing both the parties, be pleased to quash/set-aside the Office Letter No.5519/DIB, dtd. 18.07.2026 issued by the P.No.2 under Annexure-4
And further be pleased to direct the Opp. party- Bank to consider the representation of the petitioner as under Annexure-5, give her physical possession of the mortgaged property as mentioned in the schedule below, waiving out the interest part of the entire loan dues.”
3. Mr. Biswal, learned counsel for the Bank submits that in the meantime, possession of the secured assets
Amit/Rajesh has already been taken over with the Police assistance. Hence, the Writ Petition does not survive to be adjudicated.
4. As such, Mr. Paul, learned counsel for the Petitioner prays for withdrawal of the Writ Petition to avail the remedy before the Debts Recovery Tribunal.
5. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of such submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
6. The Petitioner may, if so advised, approach the Bank for settlement of the loan account.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo)
Judge
Digitally Signed Signed by: AMIT KUMAR MOHANTY Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 02-Sep-2026 10:12:09 Signature Not Verified