Orissa High Court

BLAPL/6089/2026 of SUMANTA JENA @ SUMANATA JENA Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 1 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.6089 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010429202026 Sumanta Jena @ Sumanata Jena … Petitioner Mr. A . Mishra, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha … Opposite Party Mr. M.R. Patra, Addl. PP CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER(ORAL):

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

BLAPL No.6089 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010429202026

Sumanta Jena @ Sumanata

Jena

…

Petitioner

Mr. A. Mishra, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha

…

Opposite Party

Mr. M.R. Patra, Addl. PP

CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY

Order No.

ORDER(ORAL): 01.09.2026

02.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This is a bail application U/S.483 of BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Korei P.S. Case No.139 of 2015 corresponding to Special G.R. Case No. 100 of 2015(A) pending in the file of learned ADJ-cum-FTSC (1), Jajpur, for commission of offences punishable U/Ss. 363/366/376(2)(i)/34 of IPC, r/w Sec. 4 of the POCSO Act.

2. Heard, Mr. Arijeet Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M.R. Patra, learned Additional Public Prosecutor in the matter and perused the record.

3. Admittedly, this is a bail jump case, but the petitioner was taken into custody on 13.03.2026 on the strength of an NBWA issued on 12.12.2024 and, thereby, the petitioner must have felt the rigor of law by remaining in custody for flouting the order of the Court. In the aforesaid premises, this Court by taking a lenient view, admits the petitioner to bail.

4. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands allowed and he is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) only with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it with following conditions:-

(i) the petitioner in the course of trial shall attend the trial Court on each date of posting without fail unless his attendance are dispensed with.

(ii) In case the Petitioner fails without sufficient cause to appear in the Court in accordance with the terms of the bail, the learned trial Court may proceed against the Petitioner for offence U/S.269 of BNS, 2023 in accordance with law.

5. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules. A soft copy of this order be immediately communicated to the concerned Court, who shall afterwards communicate the same to the concerned Jail through e-mail for reference.

(G. Satapathy)

Judge

S.Sasmal Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHASMITA SASMAL Designation: Sr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 01-Sep-2026 18:59:49 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead