Orissa High Court
WP(C)/27672/2026 of BIPIN BEHARI BEHERA Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 1 September 2026
of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 27672 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010611162026 Bipin Behari Behera ..... Petitioner Mr. S.K. Ojha, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. A . Tripathy, AGA CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER
Page 1 of 2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C) No. 27672 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010611162026
Bipin Behari Behera
.....
Petitioner
Mr. S.K. Ojha, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors.
.....
Opposite Parties
Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
01.09.2026 Order No. 01
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties.
3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “Under the circumstances, this Hon'ble Court may be graciously pleased to issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the Opposite Parties to regularise the services of the Petitioner with effect from 25.03.2021 instead of 03.06.2025 by way of modifying the order dated 03.06.2025 (Annex.7) in accordance with the Odisha Disability Rehabilitation Service (Method of Recruitment and Condition of Service of the Staff in the District Disability Rehabilitation Centres under the control of The Social Security & Empowerment of Persons with Disability Department) Rules, 2021.
And issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the Opposite Parties to count the Petitioner's uninterrupted service rendered from the date of his initial appointment/engagement towards qualifying service for the purpose of pension and all other retiral benefits;
Page 2 of 2. And direct the Opp. Parties to extend all consequential and financial benefits consequence to the prayers made above and extended to similarly situated persons in the meantime.
If the Opp. Parties failed to show cause or show insufficient cause rule may be made absolute.
And further be pleased to pass any other order/orders as deemed fit and proper; And for this act of kindness, the Petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray.”
4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that though highlighting his grievances, Petitioner has filed a representation at Annexure-8 to the Writ Petition before the Opp. Party No. 1, but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, learned counsel for the Petitioner prays that a direction be issued to Opposite Party No. 1 to take a decision on the above noted Petition within a specific time period.
5. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs Opposite Party No. 1 to take a decision on the above noted petition in accordance with law, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to the Petitioner.
6. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.
(BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY)
Judge Sneha Digitally Signed Signed by: SNEHANJALI PARIDA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 03-Sep-2026 13:08:24 Signature Not Verified