Orissa High Court

BLAPL/6105/2026 of SK SHARUK Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 1 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.6105 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010239782026 Sk. Sharuk … Petitioner Mr. R.C. Moharana, Advocate -versus- State of Orissa … Opposite Party Mr. M.R. Patra, Addl. PP CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER(ORAL):01.09.2026 02. 1. This

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

BLAPL No.6105 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010239782026

Sk. Sharuk

…

Petitioner

Mr. R.C. Moharana, Advocate

-versus-

State of Orissa

…

Opposite Party

Mr. M.R. Patra, Addl. PP

CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY

Order No.

ORDER(ORAL):01.09.2026

02.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode).

2. This is a bail application U/S.483 of the BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Jaleswar PS Case No.158 of 2025 corresponding to SC Case No.07 of 2025 pending in the Court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Jaleswar for commission of offence punishable U/Ss21(C) of the NDPS Act, on the main allegation of possessing 257grams (net weight) of Brown Sugar.

3. Heard, Mr. Ramesh Chandra Moharana, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M.R. Patra, learned Additional Public Prosecutor in the matter and perused the record together with the copy of depositions of Pws.1 to 5 as produced.

4. After having considered the rival submission and taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offence as alleged against the petitioner vis-à-vis the accusation sought to be brought against him and regard being had to the recovery and seizure of 257 grams of Brown Sugar, which is above the commercial quantity allegedly from possession of the petitioner and taking into consideration of the evidence of the witnesses keeping in view the provision of Sec.37 of NDPS Act, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

5. At this stage, Mr. Ramesh Chandra Moharana, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of Court to withdraw the present bail application. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands disposed of as withdrawn. A soft copy of this order be immediately communicated to the concerned Court, who shall afterwards communicate the same to the concerned Jail through e-mail for reference.

(G. Satapathy)

Judge

Jayakrushna Digitally Signed Signed by: JAYAKRUSHNA DASH Designation: Jr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 01-Sep-2026 19:11:36 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead