Orissa High Court

BLAPL/6091/2026 of ACHUTA ALTIA @ GOLA Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 1 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.6091 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010429972026 Achuta Altia @ Gola … Petitioner Mr. S.K. Mahanty, Advocate -versus- State of Orissa … Opposite Party Mr. M.R. Patra, Addl. PP CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER(ORAL)01.09.2026 02. 1.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

BLAPL No.6091 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010429972026

Achuta Altia @ Gola

…

Petitioner

Mr. S.K. Mahanty, Advocate

-versus-

State of Orissa

…

Opposite Party

Mr. M.R. Patra, Addl. PP

CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY

Order No.

ORDER(ORAL)01.09.2026

02.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode).

2. This is a bail application U/S.483 of BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Jagannath Prasad PS Case No.195 of corresponding to GR Case No.296 of 2025 in connection with ST Case No.150 of 2025 pending in the file of learned JMFC, Jagannath Prasad for commission of offences punishable U/Ss.103(1)/238(b)/3(5) of BNS, on the main allegation of committing murder of the deceased Hadubandhu Gouda by assaulting him with wooden plank, stone and broken bear bottles.

3. Heard, Mr. Santosh Kumar Mahanty, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M.R. Patra, learned Additional Public Prosecutor in the matter and perused the record.

4. After having considered the rival submissions upon perusal of record, there appears allegation against the petitioner for committing murder of the deceased, but the case is mainly based on extra judicial confession of the petitioner before PW.6, who has turned hostile to the prosecution case. Further, in the meantime six witnesses have already been examined, but none of them have substantially testified against the petitioner, however, the petitioner is in custody since 23.04.2025, but the trial is yet to be concluded, and material witnesses have already been examined. In the aforesaid premises and on consideration of the pre- trial detention of the petitioner in custody, this Court without expressing any view on merit admits the petitioner to bail.

5. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands allowed and the petitioner is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-Five Thousand) only with one solvent surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it.

6. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of.

7. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules. A soft copy of this order be immediately communicated to the concerned Court, who shall afterwards communicate the same to the concerned Jail through e-mail for reference.

(G. Satapathy)

Judge

Jayakrushna Digitally Signed Signed by: JAYAKRUSHNA DASH Designation: Jr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 01-Sep-2026 19:11:36 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead