Orissa High Court

WP(C)/22264/2024 of DEBABANDANA APATA Vs THE COLLECTOR CUM D.M. GANJAM on 1 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C). NO.22264 of 2024 CNR No. ODHC010644842024 Debabandana Apata …. Petitioner Ms. Anima Barik, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Akshaya Kumar Pandey, Advocate -versus- The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Ganjam and others …. Opp. Parties

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C). NO.22264 of 2024

CNR No. ODHC010644842024

Debabandana Apata

….

Petitioner

Ms. Anima Barik, Advocate

on behalf of Mr. Akshaya Kumar Pandey, Advocate

-versus-

The Collector-cum-District Magistrate,

Ganjam and others

….

Opp. Parties

CORAM:

JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA

JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Order No. 01.09.2026

01.

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. This writ petition has been fled with the following prayer: “The petitioner therefore, humbly prays that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be plea ed to admit the writ application, issue a Rule NISI calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the opposite party no-1 shall not be directed to settle the land in favour of the petitioner within a stipulated period, if the opposite parties failed to show cause or shown insufficient cause the rule may be made absolute against the Opp Parties. AND May pass any other appropriate direction(s)/ order(s) as this Hon'ble Court considers may deem just and proper. AND For this act of kindness the petitioners shall as in duty bound ever pray.”

Digitally Signed Signed by: ROJALIN NAYAK Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 02-Sep-2026 13:19:05 Signature Not Verified

3. Ms. Barik, learned counsel being authorized by Mr. Pandey, learned counsel for the Petitioner, by filing a memo prays for withdrawal of the writ petition.

4. The memo so filed is taken on record.

5. In view of the memo filed, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge

(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo)

Judge Rojalin Digitally Signed Signed by: ROJALIN NAYAK Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 02-Sep-2026 13:19:05 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead