Orissa High Court

ABLAPL/10027/2026 of JITENDRA MOHANTY @ SANA MOHANTY Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 1 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.10027 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010648902026 Jitendra Mohanty @ Sana Mohanty …. Petitioner Mr. M. Nandy, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. A . K. Pati, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 01.09.2026 01.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No.10027 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010648902026

Jitendra Mohanty @

Sana Mohanty

….

Petitioner

Mr. M. Nandy, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha

….

Opposite Party

Mr. A. K. Pati, ASC

CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

01.09.2026

01.

1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with T.R. Case No.24 of 2026 pending on the file of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-Cum-Special Judge, Umerkote, Nabarangpur arising out of Umerkote P.S. Case No.301 of 2026 for commission of offences punishable under Section 21(a) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

3. The allegation against the present Petitioner is that he along with the other co-accused was involved in the transportation of contraband (Brown Sugar) to the tune of 03.94 grams.

4. It is submitted by the learned counsel that the basis of implication is on account of the co-accused statement. Hence, the Petitioner may be protected by pre-arrest bail.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for pre-arrest bail during currency of investigation.

6. Taking into account the nature of allegations and the quantity of contraband which is less than the small quantity as per the table of the NDPS Act, this Court directs that on surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, the Petitioner shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just and proper subject to verification of criminal antecedent of similar nature.

7. If it comes to the fore that the Petitioner has any such criminal antecedent, this order shall not be given effect to.

8. Additionally, it is directed that the Petitioner shall appear before the jurisdictional Police Station once a month for the next six months on such date and time to be fixed by the learned Court in seisin or till submission of final form whichever is earlier. Certification of such appearance shall be submitted to the learned Court in seisin.

9. It is needless to state that the Petitioner shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation.

10. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of.

(V. NARASINGH)

Judge

Jina Digitally Signed Signed by: JINA DIGAL Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 02-Sep-2026 15:27:02 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead