Orissa High Court
WP(C)/3840/2025 of PETTY OFFICER BIJOYANANDA BEHERA RETD Vs UNION OF INDIA on 1 September 2026
of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 3840 of 2025 CNR No. ODHC010086212025 Petty Officer Bijoyananda Behera Retd. ..... Petitioner Mr. S. Beura, Advocate -versus- Union of India & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Parhi, DSGI along with Ms. N. Sahoo, CGC CORAM: THE HON'BLE
Page 1 of 2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C) No. 3840 of 2025
CNR No. ODHC010086212025
Petty Officer Bijoyananda
Behera Retd.
.....
Petitioner
Mr. S. Beura, Advocate
-versus-
Union of India & Ors.
.....
Opposite Parties
Mr. P.K. Parhi, DSGI
along with
Ms. N. Sahoo, CGC
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
01.09.2026 Order No. 03
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties.
3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “In the above premises, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to:-
a. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the opposite parties to revise the pay and pension of the Petitioner with Disability Element and DA thereupon, from the date of grant of MACP-III in CPO Grade as per 6th CPC resolutions and further issue Corrigendum PPOs on revision on retirement in 6th CPC, OROP-I, 7th CPC, OROP-II and OROP-III; and b. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the opposite parties to grant arrears of revised pay and pension and interest thereupon to Petitioner from due date till it is paid; and
C. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing
Page 2 of 2. the opposite parties to not to further revise and deduct commutation amount from the pension or revised pension of Petitioner as commutation being absolute; and
d. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly a writ in the nature of direction, directing the opposite parties to provide an updated Audited Calculation Sheet' and 'Due Drawn Statement' to Petitioner till the date of realisation of revised pension; or
e. Pass such further or other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case.
AND FOR THIS ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER AS IN DUTY BOUND SHALL EVER PRAY”
4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No. 5 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of her claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence.
5. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No. 5 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 5 be communicated to the Petitioner.
6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY)
Judge Sneha Digitally Signed Signed by: SNEHANJALI PARIDA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 03-Sep-2026 13:12:15 Signature Not Verified