Orissa High Court
WP(C)/20708/2026 of SUBASHREE PANIGRAHI Vs L.I.C., HOUSING FINANCE LTD., MUMBAI on 31 August 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 20708 OF 2026 CNR No. ODHC010292922026 Subhashree Panigrahi …. Petitioner Mr. Brahmananda Tripathy, Advocate -versus- L.I.C., Housing Finance Ltd., Mumbai and another …. Opp. Parties CORAM: JUSTICE KRUSHNA RAM MOHAPATRA JUSTICE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 20708 OF 2026
CNR No. ODHC010292922026
Subhashree Panigrahi
….
Petitioner
Mr. Brahmananda Tripathy, Advocate
-versus-
L.I.C., Housing Finance Ltd., Mumbai
and another
….
Opp. Parties
CORAM:
JUSTICE KRUSHNA RAM MOHAPATRA
JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Order No. 31.08.2026
2.
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:
“It is therefore respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit the writ petition, issue 'Rule-Nisi', calling upon the opposite parties to show-cause as to why their vacate notice vide Aimexure-14 shall not be quashed and as to why they shall not act strictly pursuant to the offer letter/sanction letter vide Aimexure-2 and as to why the hiding charges contrary to the sanction letter shall not be waived, if the opposite parties failed to show- cause or show insufficient cause the said rule may be made absolute and the writ petition may be allowed in favour of the petitioner directing the opposite parties not to insist & act upon the vacate notice and to quash the said vacate notice vide Annexure-14 and to direct the opposite parties to regularize the loan account of the petitioner by waiving out the hiding charges; Digitally Signed Signed by: MADHUSMITA SAHOO Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 02-Sep-2026 10:27:09 Signature Not Verified
And further would be pleased to pass any other appropriate order or orders as may deem fit & proper in the eye of law;
And for this act of kindness the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.”
3. Mr. Tripathy, learned counsel for the Petitioner, submits that the matter has been settled between the parties in the meantime. Hence, the Petitioner prays for withdrawal of the writ petition. He also files a memo of withdrawal along with the email communication, which is taken on record.
4. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the Petitioner, the writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo) ms
Judge Digitally Signed Signed by: MADHUSMITA SAHOO Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 02-Sep-2026 10:27:09 Signature Not Verified