Orissa High Court
WP(C)/27460/2026 of SADHU CHARAN BEHERA Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 31 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C )NO.27460 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010644392026 Sadhu Charan Behera …. Petitioner Mr. P.N. Pattanaik, Adv. -versus- State Of Odisha & Others …. Opposite Parties Mr. A . Tripathy, AGA COROM: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C )NO.27460 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010644392026
Sadhu Charan Behera
….
Petitioner
Mr. P.N. Pattanaik,
Adv.
-versus-
State Of Odisha & Others
….
Opposite Parties
Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA
COROM:
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
31.08.2026
2. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:
It is therefore prayed this Honourable Court by going through the submission made by Counsel for the Petitioner as well as documentary evidence on the Writ Petition be pleased to admit the Writ Petition further be pleased issue direction in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or order or direction, commanding to the Opp. Party No.2 more specifically Collector, Phulbani ensured the Petitioner to be appointed in regular establishment by getting sanction from the department of Panchayat Raj, if the
// 2 //
Honourable Court may pass any appropriate order or direction as the Honourable Court may feel deem fit and proper. And for which act of kindness the Petitioner shall as in duty bound shall ever pray.
4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.3 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence.
5. It is observed that if any such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No. 3 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 1 be communicated to the Petitioner.
6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge sangita Digitally Signed Signed by: SANGITA PATRA Reason: authentication of order Location: high court of orissa, cuttack Date: 01-Sep-2026 19:47:55 Signature Not Verified