Orissa High Court
CONTC/4551/2024 of LOCHAN NAYAK Vs DEORANJAN KUMAR SINGH, I.A.S. on 29 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.4551 of 2024 CNR NO. ODHC010389722024 Lochan Nayak & Another …. Petitioners Mr. S. Rath, Adv. -versus- Deoranjan Kumar Singh, IAS & Others …. Opp. Parties Mr. P.K. Sahoo, ASC CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No.4551 of 2024
CNR NO. ODHC010389722024
Lochan Nayak & Another
….
Petitioners
Mr. S. Rath, Adv.
-versus-
Deoranjan Kumar Singh, IAS
& Others
….
Opp. Parties
Mr. P.K. Sahoo, ASC
CORAM:
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
29.08.2026
10. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid
Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
3. This Contempt Petition has been filed inter alia seeking compliance of an order passed by the Tribunal in O.A. 826 (C ) of 1995, so disposed of on 27.04.2016, further reiterated by this Court in its order dtd.02.12.2019 in W.P(C ) No.22929 of 2019.
4. As found from the show-cause enclosed to the Contempt Petition and filed by Opp. party No.2, order passed by the Tribunal, after being implemented with due regularization of the deceased employee, the entitlement as due and admissible to the deceased employee and so also the claim of the present Petitioner to get family pension has been forwarded to the Office of Principal Accountant General by B.D.O, Mahanga-Opp. party No.3 vide his letter
// 2 //
dtd.17.02.2026 under Annexure-B/2 to the show- cause filed by Opp. party No.2.
5. Since the order passed by the Tribunal has already been complied, with due regularization of deceased employee and claim as due to the deceased employee and so also claim of the substituted petitioner to get the benefit of family pension has already been forwarded by Opp. party No.3 to the Office of Principal Accountant General vide letter dtd.17.02.2026, it is the view of this Court that no further Contempt lies. If Petitioner has not yet get the benefit, on the face of such recommendation made by B.D.O, Mahanga in his letter dtd.17.02.2026, Petitioner can very well make an application in that regard for consideration.
6. With the aforesaid liberty, the Contempt Petition stands disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge sangita Digitally Signed Signed by: SANGITA PATRA Reason: authentication of order Location: high court of orissa, cuttack Date: 02-Sep-2026 15:15:04 Signature Not Verified