Orissa High Court

WP(C)/26041/2026 of SUBODHA KUMAR DASH Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 29 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C ) No.26041 of 2026 CNR NO. ODHC010577362026 Subodha Kumar Dash …. Petitioner Mr. P.K. Mohapatra, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Others …. Opp. Parties Mr. P.K. Sahoo, ASC CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C ) No.26041 of 2026

CNR NO. ODHC010577362026

Subodha Kumar Dash

….

Petitioner

Mr. P.K. Mohapatra, Adv.

-versus-

State of Odisha & Others

….

Opp. Parties

Mr. P.K. Sahoo, ASC

CORAM:

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

29.08.2026

2.

1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid

Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.

2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.

3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer : Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to:

(i) direct the Opp. Parties to include the Petitioner under O.C.S. (Pension) Rules, 1992, by counting his past period of services, rendered since 12.08.1988, along with regular services, as qualifying services for computing the pension and pensionary benefits in view of the settled principles of law, decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP(C) C.C. No.17901 of 2011, disposed of on 30.07.2012(State of Punjab & Ors. Vs. Harbans Lal) and Amarkant Rai Vs. State of Bihar & Ors., reported in (2015) 5 SC 265 for the purpose of grant of pension and all consequential benefits;

// 2 //

(ii) pass such other order(s) or issue direction(s) as may be deemed fit and proper in the bona fide interest of justice. And for this act of kindness, the Petitioner shall as in duty bound, ever pray.

4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.3 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence.

5. It is observed that if any such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No. 3 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 3 be communicated to the Petitioner.

6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)

Judge sangita Digitally Signed Signed by: SANGITA PATRA Reason: authentication of order Location: high court of orissa, cuttack Date: 31-Aug-2026 19:10:32 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead