Orissa High Court

BLAPL/6674/2026 of MUJAFAR KUMBHAR @ BANTY Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 29 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.6674 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010480392026 Mujafar Kumbhar @ Banty … Petitioner Mr. S.N. Sahoo, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha … Opposite Party Mr. T.K. Acharya, Addl. PP CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER(ORAL) : 29.08.2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

BLAPL No.6674 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010480392026

Mujafar Kumbhar @ Banty

…

Petitioner

Mr. S.N. Sahoo, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha

…

Opposite Party

Mr. T.K. Acharya, Addl. PP

CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY

Order No.

ORDER(ORAL) : 29.08.2026

01.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This is a bail application U/S.483 of the BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Bharatpur P.S. Case No. 499 of 2024 corresponding to C.T. Case No. 76 of 2025 pending in the Court of learned 2nd Addl. Sessions Judge, Bhubaneswar, for commission of offence punishable U/Ss. 103(1)/238(a)/3(5) of BNS, on the main allegation of committing murder of the deceased Nabaghana Patasahani by stabbing him to death in a hotel room.

2. Heard Mr. Sanjaya Narayan Sahoo, learned counsel appearing virtually for the petitioner and Mr. T.K. Acharya, learned Addl. PP in the matter and perused the record.

3. After having considered the rival submissions upon perusal of record, there appears allegation against the petitioner for committing murder of the deceased by stabbing him to death and the PM report of the deceased reveals around 13 stab injuries on his person. No doubt, bail has been sought for to the petitioner on the ground of parity, but co-accused released on bail does not stand on similar footing, inasmuch as the allegation against the co- accused released on bail is primarily for disposing the dead body. In the aforesaid facts and situation and taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offences as alleged against the petitioner vis-à-vis the accusations sought to be brought against him and regard being had to the materials placed on record together with the recovery of the weapon of offence pursuant to the disclosure statement of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. A soft copy of this order be immediately forwarded to the court in seisin over the matter for reference.

(G. Satapathy)

Judge

S.Sasmal Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHASMITA SASMAL Designation: Sr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 29-Aug-2026 15:32:01 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead