Orissa High Court
WP(C)/27570/2026 of DILIP KUMAR MISHRA Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 29 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.27570 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010655032026 Dilip Kumar Mishra …. Petitioner Mr. T.K. Nayak, Advocate -versus- State of Orissa & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. A . Tripathy, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.27570 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010655032026
Dilip Kumar Mishra
….
Petitioner
Mr. T.K. Nayak, Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa & Ors.
….
Opposite Parties
Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
29.08.2026
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties.
3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “The petitioner therefore prays that your Lordships may graciously be pleased to direct the Opp. Parties to consider the case of the petitioner for allowing pension and pensionary benefits by counting his past service rendered under J.C. Estt. and Regular Estt. in the light of the benefit given to similarly situated employees under the All-Orissa Settlement and Consolidation Non-Gazette Technical Officers Association, Dhenkanal vide Govt. order dated 04.08.2023 as well as the Diary No.55335 of 2024 and disposed of on 24.07.2025 by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
And pass such other orders/directions as may be deemed fit and proper.
// 2 //
And for this act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray”.
4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that highlighting his grievance, Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.1 vide Annexure-6 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection.
5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.1 to consider the representation filed by the Petitioner vide Annexure-6 within a period of three (3) months in accordance with law from the date of production of certified copy of this order with due communication to the Petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Subrat
Judge Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBRAT KUMAR BARIK Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 31-Aug-2026 12:43:42 Signature Not Verified