Orissa High Court

WP(C)/25197/2026 of PRAVAT KUMAR MOHANTY Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 29 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C ) No.25197 of 2026 CNR NO. ODHC01046672026 Pravat Kumar Mohanty …. Petitioner Mr. S.P. Jena, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Others …. Opp. Parties Mr. P.K. Sahoo, ASC CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C ) No.25197 of 2026

CNR NO. ODHC01046672026

Pravat Kumar Mohanty

….

Petitioner

Mr. S.P. Jena, Adv.

-versus-

State of Odisha & Others

….

Opp. Parties

Mr. P.K. Sahoo, ASC

CORAM:

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

29.08.2026

1.

1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid

Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.

2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.

3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer: In the aforesaid circumstances, it is humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ/writs by directing the Opp.Parties to sanction pension and other retirement dues as per OCS (Pension) Rules, 1992 from the date retirement in favour of the petitioner by regularizing his service with retrospective by taking into account the judgments passed by this Hon'ble Court in Khageswar Jena's Case in W.P(C)No.29993/2022,confirmed in WA No.301 of 2023 and in SLP(C)No.12174/2024. And further be pleased to direct the Opp. Parties to grant all consequential service and financial benefits. And/or pass such other order/orders as may be deemed fit and proper for the interest of justice.

// 2 //

And, for this act of kindness the Petitioners as in duty bound shall ever pray.

4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that highlighting his grievances, Petitioner has made a representation vide Annexure-5 to the Writ Petition before Opposite Party No.2 and the same may be directed to be considered and disposed of within a stipulated time period to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection.

5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, dispose of the Writ Petition with a direction on Opposite Party No.2 to consider and dispose of the representation vide Annexure-5 to the Writ Petition in accordance with law, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of this order with due communication to the Petitioner.

6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)

Judge sangita Digitally Signed Signed by: SANGITA PATRA Reason: authentication of order Location: high court of orissa, cuttack Date: 31-Aug-2026 19:10:32 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead