Orissa High Court
WP(C)/24547/2024 of DEBAPRIYA BIBEKANANDA PRADHAN Vs UNION OF INDIA on 29 August 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C). NO.24547 of 2024 CNR No. ODHC010695052024 Debapriya Bibekananda Pradhan …. Petitioner Mr. Ramakanta Das, Advocate -versus- Union of India and others …. Opp. Parties Mr. Prasanna Kumar Parhi, DSGI along with Mr. Deepak Gochhayat,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C). NO.24547 of 2024
CNR No. ODHC010695052024
Debapriya Bibekananda Pradhan
….
Petitioner
Mr. Ramakanta Das, Advocate
-versus-
Union of India and others
….
Opp. Parties
Mr. Prasanna Kumar Parhi, DSGI
along with Mr. Deepak Gochhayat, CGC
Mr. R.C. Mohanty, Advocate
(For Opp. Party Nos.2 and 3)
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Order No. 29.08.2026
01.
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer: “It is therefore prayed that your lordship may graciously be pleased to admit the Writ application and issue notice to the Opp. Parties under Rule-NISI calling upon the Opp. Party to file show cause as to why the petitioner shall not be allowed to appear in Exit Examination with specific subjects as given under Diploma In Pharmacy Exit Examination Regulation 2022 and after hearing both parties the Opp. Party no. 4 may direct conduct Exit Examination with the subjects given under Regulation 2022 for ends of justice. And for which act of your kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.”
3. Mr. Das, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that due to passage of time, the writ petition has become infructuous. Digitally Signed Signed by: ROJALIN NAYAK Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 29-Aug-2026 15:09:29 Signature Not Verified
4. Mr. Parhi, learned DSGI and Mr. Mohanty, learned counsel for Opposite Party Nos.2 and 3 submit that in view of the passage of time, the writ petition has become infructuous.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo)
Judge Rojalin Digitally Signed Signed by: ROJALIN NAYAK Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 29-Aug-2026 15:09:29 Signature Not Verified