Orissa High Court

WP(C)/997/2024 of PRADEEP KUMAR GOCHHAYAT Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 29 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 997 of 2024 CNR No.ODHC010007072024 Pradeep Kumar Gochhayat & Ors. ..... Petitioners Mr. B. Pujari, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Panda, ASC Mr. B.P. Tripathy, Sr. Counsel (for O.P. No.2) CORAM:

Page 1 of 2.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 997 of 2024

CNR No.ODHC010007072024

Pradeep Kumar Gochhayat & Ors. .....

Petitioners

Mr. B. Pujari, Adv.

-versus-

State of Odisha & Ors.

.....

Opposite Parties

Mr. P.K. Panda, ASC

Mr. B.P. Tripathy, Sr. Counsel

(for O.P. No.2)

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

29.08.2026 Order No. 07

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. Heard.

3. In course of hearing, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners contended that even though the matter relates to an advertisement issued in the year 2013 and Petitioners are not protected by any interim order, but since some vacancies are available at present, Petitioner be given liberty to move Opp. Party No.2 for consideration of the grievance and engagement against such vacancies, if any.

Page 2 of 2.

4. Learned Addl. Standing Counsel as well as learned Senior Counsel appearing for Opp. Party No.2 have no serious objection to the course of action proposed by the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners.

5. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties and considering the submission made, it is observed that if any such application is moved within a period of three (3) weeks hence, Opp. Party No. 2 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a further period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such application. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 2 be communicated to the Petitioners.

6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.

(BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY)

Judge

Jyoti Digitally Signed Signed by: JYOTIPRAVA BHOL Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA Date: 01-Sep-2026 11:49:01 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead