Orissa High Court

WP(C)/27563/2026 of SAROJ KUMAR TRIPATHY Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 29 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.27563 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010653962026 Saroj Kumar Tripathy …. Petitioner Mr. S.K. Samal, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. A . Tripathy, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.27563 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010653962026

Saroj Kumar Tripathy

….

Petitioner

Mr. S.K. Samal, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha & Ors.

….

Opposite Parties

Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA

CORAM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

29.08.2026

1.

1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties.

3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “Therefore, in view of the abovesaid fact and circumstances, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue notice to the Opp. Parties and after hearing the parties, may be pleased to direct the Opp. Parties more particularly to the Opp. Parties No.1 and 2 to bring the petitioner into regular establishment w.e.f. the date of completion of 5 years in the work charge establishment taking into consideration the law decided by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.(C) No.21449/2022 (Narendra Kumar Sahoo Vrs. State of Odisha and others), W.P.(C) No. 10944/2022 (Saroj Kanta Chaini Vrs. State of Odisha and other); And/or pass any other order as may be deemed just and proper in the circumstances of this case;

// 2 //

And for which act of kindness the petitioner, as in duty bound shall remain ever pray.”.

4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.2 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence.

5. It is observed that if such a representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No.2 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No.2 be communicated to the Petitioner.

6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Subrat

Judge Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBRAT KUMAR BARIK Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 31-Aug-2026 12:43:42 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead