Orissa High Court
WP(C)/27139/2026 of LAXMIPRIYA NAIK Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 28 August 2026
of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 27139 of 2026 CNR No.ODHC010649772026 Laxmipriya Naik ..... Petitioner Mr. H.K. Mahanta, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. A . Tripathy, AGA CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER
Page 1 of 2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 27139 of 2026
CNR No.ODHC010649772026
Laxmipriya Naik
.....
Petitioner
Mr. H.K. Mahanta, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors.
.....
Opposite Parties
Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
28.08.2026 Order No. 01
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. On the oral prayer made by the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner, he is permitted to correct the description of Opp. Party No.4 in Court as CDPO, Rasgobindpur.
3. Heard learned counsel for Petitioner and learned counsel for the State-Opposite Parties.
4. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is therefore prayed that, this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit the writ petition, issue Rule Nisi in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other writ (s) as deem fit and proper, calling upon the Opp. Parties to show cause as to why the Opp.Parties particularly the Opp.Party No.4 CDPO, Rasgobindpur shall not be directed to release/disburse the monthly salary of
Page 2 of 2. the petitioner w.e.f. the month of December till date and also to pay her the current salary regularly along with the interest from the month of December 2025 till the payment is made And if the opp. parties fail to show cause or show insufficient cause the said rule be made absolute. And Pass any other writ/ writs, order/orders as this Hon'ble court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. For this act of your kindness the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.”
5. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner state that highlighting his grievances, the Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.4 vide Annexure-6 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection.
6. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.4 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-6 in accordance with law within a period of three (3) months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.
(BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY)
Judge
Jyoti Digitally Signed Signed by: JYOTIPRAVA BHOL Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA Date: 29-Aug-2026 16:56:08 Signature Not Verified