Orissa High Court

ABLAPL/9833/2026 of JANMEJAYA BAL @ BABU Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 28 August 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.9833 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010626712026 1. Janmejaya Bal @ Babu 2. Bhaskar Bal 3. Biswajit Bal 4. Hrushikesh Bal 5. Jay Jagdish Bal @ Biki 6. Rocky Bal 7. Manoranjan Bal @ Gulu 8. Urmila Bal …. Petitioners Mr. A . C. Mohapatra, Advocate

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No.9833 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010626712026

1. Janmejaya Bal @

Babu

2. Bhaskar Bal

3. Biswajit Bal

4. Hrushikesh Bal

5. Jay Jagdish Bal @

Biki

6. Rocky Bal

7. Manoranjan Bal @

Gulu

8. Urmila Bal

….

Petitioners

Mr. A. C. Mohapatra, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha

….

Opposite Party

Mr. S. Panigrahi, ASC

CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

28.08.2026

01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioners that on the protest petition filed by the informant registered as 1CC case No.24 of 2026 on the file of learned JMFC, Mahanga cognizance has been taken for which being apprehensive of incarceration, the present application has been preferred.

3. It is apt to note that the Petitioners were cited as accused in G.R. Case No.624 of 2025 pending on the file of learned J.M.F.C, Mahanga, Cuttack, arising out of Mahanga P.S. Case No.406 of 2025 for commission of offences punishable under Sections 296/ 115(2)/ 74/ 76/ 329(4)/ 332/ 351(2)/ 3(5) of BNS, 2023 and charge sheet in the said case was filed against other co-accused excluding the Petitioners and as noted above, in view of the cognizance taken on the basis of the protest petition apprehending arrest the Petitioners have approached this Court.

4. In view of the order passed by the Apex Court in the case of Om Prakash Chhawnika @ Om Prakash Chabnika @ Om Prakash Chawnika v. State of Jharkhand and Another, 2026 SCC Online SC 676, the apprehension of the Petitioners is misconceived.

5. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of as not maintainable.

(V. NARASINGH)

Judge

Jina Digitally Signed Signed by: JINA DIGAL Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 29-Aug-2026 17:41:38 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead