Orissa High Court
WP(C)/9647/2026 of BINAY KUMAR ROUT Vs STATE BANK OF INDIA, MUMBAI on 28 August 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.9647 of 2026 CNR No.ODHC010181582026 Binay Kumar Rout …. Petitioner Mr. Rajendra Panda, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Alok Kumar Mohapatra, Advocate -versus- State Bank of India and others …. Opp. Parties CORAM: JUSTICE MRUGANKA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.9647 of 2026
CNR No.ODHC010181582026
Binay Kumar Rout
….
Petitioner
Mr. Rajendra Panda, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Alok Kumar Mohapatra, Advocate
-versus-
State Bank of India and
others
…. Opp. Parties
CORAM:
JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
28.08.2026 (Hybrid Mode)
01.
1. Mr. Panda, learned counsel on behalf of Mr. Mohapatra, learned counsel for the petitioner files memo of date for withdrawal of the writ application, which states thus:
“The counsel for the petitioner hereby submits this withdrawal memo as the petitioner does not want to proceed with the case.”
Memo is taken on record. Scanned copy be updated.
2. Mr. Shakti Prasad Das, learned counsel submits that he has instruction to appear on behalf of opposite party-State Bank of India.
3. In view of memo filed, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo) Judge Radha Digitally Signed Signed by: RADHARANI JENA Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 29-Aug-2026 16:00:02 Signature Not Verified