Orissa High Court

WP(C)/27434/2026 of MRITYUNJAY DASH Vs THE SUPERINTENDENT OF CGST AND CENTRAL EXCISE, CUTTACK on 28 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.27434 of 2026 [CNR No. ODHC010645962026] Mrityunjay Dash …. Petitioner Represented by Adv.– Ms. Upasana Bal, Advocate -Versus- The Superintendent of CGST & Central Excise, Cuttack-III Range, Odisha. …. Opposite Part

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.27434 of 2026

[CNR No. ODHC010645962026]

Mrityunjay Dash

….

Petitioner

Represented by Adv.–

Ms. Upasana Bal, Advocate

-Versus-

The Superintendent of CGST &

Central Excise, Cuttack-III Range,

Odisha.

….

Opposite Part

Represented by Adv._

Mr. Bismay Anand Prusty,

Senior Standing Counsel

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK

AND

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

28.08.2026 (Hybrid mode)

01.

1. Learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits that the show cause notice dated 4th February, 2026 followed by order dated 16th March, 2026 cancelling the registration certificate of the petitioner under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 is under challenge. She submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay the tax, interest, late fee, penalty and any other sum required to be paid along with the return. He relies on order dated 16th November, 2022 of coordinate Bench in W.P.(C) No.30374 of 2022 (M/s. Mohanty Enterprises v. The Commissioner, CT & GST, Odisha, Cuttack and others), wherein it has been observed as follows:-

"2. In that view of the matter, the delay in Petitioner’s invoking the proviso to Rule 23 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules (OGST Rules) is condoned and it is directed that subject to the Petitioner depositing all the taxes, interest, late fee, penalty etc., due and complying with other formalities, the Petitioner’s application for revocation will be considered in accordance with law."

1.1. She submits, the claim of the petitioner to relief including prayer for condonation of delay is covered by said order.

2. Learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the Department-opposite party upon perusal of said order, conceded that in the event the petitioner complies with the requirement and deposits the amounts as undertaken, the authority concerned shall do the needful.

3. In view of conceded position, the petitioner shall make payments as undertaken within a period of two weeks hence and on such eventuality the opposite party shall consider application for revocation of cancellation of the registration certificate within a period not later than six weeks from today.

4. In view of the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Manash Ranjan Pathak) Judge

(M.S. Raman) Judge

Narayan Digitally Signed Signed by: NARAYAN HO Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 31-Aug-2026 10:41:10 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead