Orissa High Court
ABLAPL/9629/2026 of ABHAYA NANDA PANDA Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 28 August 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 9629 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010629342026 Abhaya Nanda Panda …. Petitioner Mr. S.K. Joshi, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. S. Panigrahi, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 28.08.2026 02. 1. Heard
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No. 9629 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010629342026
Abhaya Nanda Panda
….
Petitioner
Mr. S.K. Joshi, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
….
Opposite Party
Mr. S. Panigrahi, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
28.08.2026
02.
1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
2. The Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with Komna P.S. Case No.290 of 2026 pending on the file of learned Court in seisin, for commission of offences punishable under sections 318(4)/319(2)/336(3)/340(2)/338/316(2)/3(5) of BNS.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that even if the entire allegation is accepted at its face value, the same is of introducing the vendor and taking into account the role ascribed to him, the Petitioner has rightly not been cited as accused and because the police is harassing him and his family, he is compelled to approach this Court.
4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for pre-arrest bail and submits that the role played by the Petitioner cannot be unearthed in the event he is protected by pre-arrest bail.
5. Considering the sequence of events, this Court is persuaded to hold that the Petitioner is not entitled for pre-arrest bail. However, it is directed that the Petitioner may surrender before the learned Court in seisin in connection with the aforementioned case within one month from today.
In the event of his surrender and motion for bail, the same be considered by the learned Court in seisin on merits, in the first hour of the day.
In the event of rejection of the prayer for bail by the learned Court in seisin, the Petitioner is at liberty to move the higher forum for bail in the second hour on the same day.
6. On being so moved, the higher forum is requested to make an endeavor to dispose of the bail application of the Petitioner on the same day.
The case diary be made available to the concerned courts to facilitate disposal of the bail application of the Petitioner and learned Court in seisin is called upon to transmit the case record to the higher forum at the earliest in the event of rejection of such bail application.
Ground of parity, if any, may be considered by the learned court(s) below.
7. The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of.
(V. NARASINGH) Ayesha
Judge Digitally Signed Signed by: AYESHA ROUT Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 29-Aug-2026 14:50:11 Signature Not Verified