Orissa High Court

CONTC/5086/2026 of SATYABRATA JENA Vs AMRIT RUTURAJ, IAS, COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KHURDA on 28 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.5086 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010551682026 Satyabrata Jena ..... Petitioner Represented by Adv. - Prabodha Chandra Nayak , S.k.sahu, D.p.mishra -versus- AMRIT RUTURAJ, IAS, COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KHURDA ..... Opposite Party/Contemnor

Page 1 of 2.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CONTC No.5086 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010551682026

Satyabrata Jena

.....

Petitioner

Represented by Adv.

- Prabodha Chandra

Nayak , S.k.sahu,

D.p.mishra

-versus-

AMRIT RUTURAJ, IAS,

COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT

MAGISTRATE, KHURDA

.....

Opposite

Party/Contemnor

Represented by Adv. –

Mr. D.K. Sahoo, AGA

CORAM:

MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

28.08.2026 Order No.

01.

1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.

2. This Contempt Petition is filed alleging violation of the order dated 25.03.2025 passed by this Court in W.P(C) No.8544 of 2025.

3. It is alleged by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the order dated 25.03.2025 passed by this Court in W.P(C) No.8544 of 2025 having been duly communicated to the Opposite Parties- Contemnors vide hand receipt under Annexure-1 to the contempt application, however, the Opposite Party-Contemnor has not implemented the same. In such view of the matter, learned counsel for the Petitioner alleged wilful and deliberate violation of this Court’s

Page 2 of 2. order which makes the Opposite Party-Contemnor liable to be proceeded under the Contempt of Court’s Act.

4. Taking into consideration the submission made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner, as a last chance, this Court grants further four weeks’ time to the Contemnor to implement the order dated 25.03.2025 passed by this Court in W.P(C) No.8544 of 2025, failing which, the Contemnor shall be asked to appear in person before this Court and to explain as to why a proceeding under the Contempt of Courts Act shall not be initiated against him for wilful and deliberate violation of this Court’s order.

5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the contempt petition is disposed of.

( A.K. Mohapatra)

Judge Sisir

Digitally Signed Signed by: SISIR KUMAR SETHI Designation: PERSONAL ASSISTANT Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT Date: 01-Sep-2026 16:14:59 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead