Orissa High Court
ABLAPL/9878/2026 of GANESH GHADEI Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 28 August 2026
of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 9878 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010619072026 Ganesh Ghadei …. Petitioner Mr. S.K. Nayak, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. A.K. Pati, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 28.08.2026 01. 1. Heard learned
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No. 9878 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010619072026
Ganesh Ghadei
….
Petitioner
Mr. S.K. Nayak, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
….
Opposite Party
Mr. A.K. Pati, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
28.08.2026
01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
2. The Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G.R. Case No.2289 of 2025 pending on the file of learned S.D.J.M., Berhampur, arising out of Baidyanathpur P.S. Case No.432 of 2025 for commission of offences punishable under Section 126(2)/115(2)/109/3(5) of BNS.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel that the Petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case at hand. Hence, he may be protected by pre-arrest bail.
4. It is further submitted that the Petitioner is similarly circumstanced with the co-accused, namely,
Kailash Ghadei, who has since been released on bail by this Court by order dated 02.12.2025 in ABLAPL No.13507 of 2025 and so far as antecedents of the Petitioner is concerned, he is cited as an accused in Baidyanathpur P.S. Case No.115 of 2019 U/s.147/ 148/ 294/ 323/ 506/ 149 of IPC and Section 3/4/5 of OPG Act read with Section 25(1)(b)(a)/27 of Arms Act read with Section 4/5 of E.S. Act.
5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for pre-arrest bail.
6. Considering the nature of allegations and the order passed in respect of the co-accused, this Court directs that on surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, the Petitioner shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just and proper subject to verification of any other criminal antecedent than the one as noted above and the nature of the injury.
7. If it comes to the fore that the Petitioner has any other criminal antecedent than the one as noted above and the injured has suffered any grievous injury, this order shall not be given effect to.
8. It is needless to state that the Petitioner shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation.
9. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of.
10. U.C.C. as per rules.
(V. NARASINGH)
Judge
Santoshi
Digitally Signed Signed by: SANTOSHI LENKA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 29-Aug-2026 18:26:17 Signature Not Verified