Orissa High Court

CONTC/5616/2026 of PRANATI BEHERA Vs BIRENDRA KORKARA, DIRECTOR, SECONDARY EDUCATION ODISHA, BHUBANESWAR on 28 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.5616 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010641842026 Pranati Behera ..... Petitioner Represented by Adv. - Sushanta Kumar Mishra -versus- BIRENDRA KORKARA, DIRECTOR, SECONDARY EDUCATION ODISHA, BHUBANESWAR ..... Opposite Party/Contemnor Represented by Adv.

Page 1 of 2.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CONTC No.5616 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010641842026

Pranati Behera

.....

Petitioner

Represented by Adv. -

Sushanta Kumar Mishra

-versus-

BIRENDRA KORKARA,

DIRECTOR, SECONDARY

EDUCATION ODISHA,

BHUBANESWAR

.....

Opposite

Party/Contemnor

Represented by Adv. –

Mr. U.R. Jena, AGA

CORAM:

MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

28.08.2026 Order No.

01.

1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.

2. This Contempt Petition is filed alleging violation of the order dated 06.04.2026 passed by this Court in W.P(C) No.9976 of 2026.

3. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as learned counsel for the Opposite Parties-Contemnors-State. Perused the contempt application as well as the allegation made therein.

4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner at the outset contended that although the Opposite Parties have given appointment to similar situated many other candidates, however the Petitioner has been discriminated her case has not been considered for appointment under

Page 2 of 2. the Rehabilitation Assistant Scheme. He further contended that the case of the Petitioner is squarely covered by the Notification of the GA&PG Department dated 04.04.2025.

5. On the request of the learned counsel for the Opposite Parties- Contemnors, he is granted further six weeks’ time as a last chance to ensure that the order passed by this Court is implemented in its letter and spirit, failing which the Contemnors-Opposite Parties shall be asked to appear in person before this Court and to explain as to why a proceeding under the Contempt of Courts Act shall not be initiated against him for wilful and deliberate violation of this Court’s order.

6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the contempt petition is disposed of.

( A.K. Mohapatra)

Judge Sisir

Digitally Signed Signed by: SISIR KUMAR SETHI Designation: PERSONAL ASSISTANT Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT Date: 01-Sep-2026 16:15:02 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead