Orissa High Court

WP(C)/3644/2012 of ROJALIN MOHANTY Vs SECY.INDIAN RED-CRO on 28 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C ) No.3644 of 2012 CNR NO. ODHC010039262012 Rojalin Mohanty & Others …. Petitioners Proxy counsel -versus- Secy. Indian Red-cross Society, BBSR & Another …. Opp. Parties Mr. S.P. Das, ASC CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE BIRAJA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C ) No.3644 of 2012

CNR NO. ODHC010039262012

Rojalin Mohanty & Others

….

Petitioners

Proxy counsel

-versus-

Secy. Indian Red-cross

Society, BBSR & Another

….

Opp. Parties

Mr. S.P. Das, ASC

CORAM:

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

28.08.2026

2.

1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid

Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.

2. Though the matter was listed under the heading “For Referral to the Special Mediation Drive-Mediation “For The Nation”, but on the consent learned counsel appearing for the parties, the same was taken up.

3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.

4. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:

The Petitioners, therefore, pray that your lordships would be graciously pleased to admit this writ Petition call for the records and after hearing the parties allow the same, issue writ/writs in the nature of certiorari/mandamus and/or any other further writ/direction directing the Opp. parties not to substitute temporary employees in place of the Petitioners as Data Entry Operators under the Opp. party No.2 and direct the Opp. parties to regularize the Petitioners in respect of post they are working within a stipulated period;

// 2 //

And for this act of kindness, the Petitioners shall as in duty bound ever pray.

5. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioners to make fresh representation before Opp. Party No.2 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of their claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence.

6. It is observed that if any such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No. 2 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 2 be communicated to one of the Petitioner.

7. Till a decision is taken, interim order passed earlier shall continue.

8. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)

Judge sangita Digitally Signed Signed by: SANGITA PATRA Reason: authentication of order Location: high court of orissa, cuttack Date: 31-Aug-2026 19:45:48 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead