Orissa High Court
ABLAPL/9787/2026 of HALUA JENA @ HALU Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 27 August 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 9787 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010627812026 Halua Jena@ Halu …. Petitioner Mr. S. Parida, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. S.K. Lenka, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 27.08.2026 01. 1. Learned
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No. 9787 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010627812026
Halua Jena@ Halu
….
Petitioner
Mr. S. Parida, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
….
Opposite Party
Mr. S.K. Lenka, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
27.08.2026
01. 1. Learned counsel Mr. S. Parida has entered appearance on behalf of the Opposite Party No.2 (Informant) by filing Vakalatanama. The same is taken on record.
2. Name of learned counsel Mr. S. Parida be reflected in the file, cause list as well as web portal of this Court.
3. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
4. The Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G.R. Case No.585 of 2026 pending on the file of learned Gram Nayalaya, Puri sadar, arising out of Chandanpur P.S. Case. No.183 of 2026 for commission of offences punishable under Section 109(1)/ 115(2)/ 118(2)/ 333/ 74 of BNS.
5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for pre-arrest bail referring to the injury report and the statement of the injured. It is seen that the injured has suffered multiple injuries on the head and the injured is a lady.
6. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that exaggerated allegations have been made against the Petitioner.
7. Taking into account the rival submissions and the materials which are produced by the learned counsel for the State, this Court is not inclined to entertain this application for pre-arrest bail.
However, in the event the Petitioner surrenders before the learned Court in seisin in the aforesaid case and moves application for his release on bail, the same shall be considered on its own merit
8. It is needless to state that the Petitioner shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation.
9. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of.
U.C.C. as per rules.
(V. NARASINGH)
Judge Mili
Digitally Signed Signed by: MILI MAHARANA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 28-Aug-2026 17:40:21 Signature Not Verified