Orissa High Court
WP(C)/6669/2016 of AMARESH KU SINGH Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 27 August 2026
of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 6669 of 2016 CNR No.ODHC010512422016 Amaresh Kumar Singh ..... Petitioner Mr. S. Mohanty, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. S.P. Das, ASC CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER
Page 1 of 2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 6669 of 2016
CNR No.ODHC010512422016
Amaresh Kumar Singh
.....
Petitioner
Mr. S. Mohanty, Adv.
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors.
.....
Opposite Parties
Mr. S.P. Das, ASC
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
27.08.2026 Order No. 12
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Even though the matter was listed under the heading ‘For Referral to Mediation’, but on the consent of the Parties, the matter was taken up.
3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties.
4. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “The petitioner, therefore, prays that your Lordship's would graciously be pleased to admit the writ application and after hearing the parties be pleased to direct the Ops Civil supply Corporation to pay a compensation of Rs 4 crores pending further course of action for determination of actual loss And pass any other and / or further order as deemed fit and proper under the circumstances of the case, And for this act of kindness the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.”
Page 2 of 2.
5. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.2 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of her claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence.
6. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No.2 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 2 be communicated to the Petitioner.
7. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
(BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY)
Judge
Jyoti Digitally Signed Signed by: JYOTIPRAVA BHOL Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA Date: 29-Aug-2026 11:09:02 Signature Not Verified