Orissa High Court
CMP/1363/2015 of CHANDRA SEKHAR BHOI Vs UMAKANTA NAYAK on 27 August 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No. 1363 of 2015 CNR No. - ODHC010060432015 Chandra Sekhar Bhoi …. Petitioner Ms. Spandana Pattanaik, Advocate on behalf of Mr. A.K. Behera, Advocate -versus- Umakanta Nayak and others …. Opp. Parties Mr. S. S. K. Nayak, Advocate CORAM:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CMP No. 1363 of 2015
CNR No. - ODHC010060432015
Chandra Sekhar Bhoi
….
Petitioner
Ms. Spandana Pattanaik, Advocate
on behalf of Mr. A.K. Behera, Advocate
-versus-
Umakanta Nayak and others
….
Opp. Parties
Mr. S. S. K. Nayak, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Order No.
08. 27.08.2026
(Through hybrid Mode)
1. This CMP has been filed challenging the order dated 11.12.2008 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bhadrak in Misc. Case No. 166 of 1998 (Annexure- 4), rejecting the petition filed by the Petitioner under Order 9 Rule 13 of the CPC.
2. Ms. S. Pattanaik, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. A.K. Behera, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that pursuant to order dated 06.08.2026, the copy of the postal cover along with the postal tracking report has been filed along with a memo.
3. The endorsement on the postal cover indicates that the letter dated 23.07.2026 sent by speed post to the Petitioner has returned unserved with the remark “addressee deceased RTS”.
4. Today, when the matter is taken up, a memo signed by Mr. A. Behera, learned counsel for the Petitioner is filed stating that as the letter sent to the Petitioner has returned unserved with the endorsement, „Petitioner is expired‟, they do not have any instructions to carry out substitution and proceed with the matter as no contact could be established with the legal representatives of the Petitioner, for which appropriate orders may be passed granting liberty to approach this Court if cause of action still survives. The said memo is taken on record.
5. In view of this memo, the CMP is dismissed.
6. However, the legal heirs of the Petitioner are at liberty to take steps for recall of this order and pursue this CMP by filing appropriate applications within a period of four weeks.
7. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.
(Savitri Ratho)
Judge
Subhalaxmi
Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHALAXMI PRIYADARSHANI SAHOO Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 27-Aug-2026 20:17:05 Signature Not Verified