Orissa High Court
WP(C)/26072/2026 of RAJAT KUMAR SATAPATHY Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 27 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.26072 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010615142026 Rajat Kumar Satapathy …. Petitioner Mr. S.Mohanty(1), Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and another …. Opposite Parties Mr. A . Tripathy, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.26072 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010615142026
Rajat Kumar Satapathy
….
Petitioner
Mr. S.Mohanty(1), Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and
another
….
Opposite Parties
Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
27.08.2026
02. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer: - “It is therefore, prayed that in the facts and circumstances above and in the interest of justice, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to admit the petition and after hearing the parties direct the Opposite Party No.1 to Grant Service benefits as per Level-13 of Pay Matrix under ORSP, Rules 2017 in pursuance to DPC did. 29.01.2026 and re-fix the pension of the petitioner as has been extended to the other employees vide Govt. Notification No.7184 dtd.02.06.2026 in pursuance to said DPC dtd.29.01.2026.
And pass the orders and issue such directions as this Hon'ble Court may be proper in law.
For this act of kindness, the petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray.”
4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that through highlighting his grievances, the petitioner has filed a representation vide Annexure-10 to the Writ
// 2 //
Petition, but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, he prays that a direction be issued to the Opposite Party No.1 to take a decision on the above noted petition within a specific time period.
5. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs the Opposite Party No.1 to take a decision on the above noted representation in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to the petitioner.
6. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge Nitu Prava Digitally Signed Signed by: NITU PRAVA PRUSTY Reason: Authentication Location: OHC, Cuttack Date: 28-Aug-2026 16:48:32 Signature Not Verified