Orissa High Court
WP(C)/27144/2026 of PARBATI SAHOO Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 27 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.27144 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010641342026 Parbati Sahoo …. Petitioner Mr. S. Roy, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and Others …. Opposite Parties Mr. P.K Panda, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER 27.08.2026 01. 1.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.27144 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010641342026
Parbati Sahoo
….
Petitioner
Mr. S. Roy, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and Others
….
Opposite Parties
Mr. P.K Panda, ASC
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
27.08.2026
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer: - “It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit the writ petition and issue Rule "NISI" to the Opp. Parties to show cause as to;
(i) Why the action of the Opposite Parties in not regularizing the services of the petitioner's husband in the facts and circumstances of the case will not be declared as illegal; and
(ii) Why the Opposite Parties will not be directed to regularize the services of the petitioner's husband within a stipulated time; and
(iii) Why the Opposite Parties will not be directed to sanction pension, family pension and other pensionary benefits as due and admissible under the OCS (Pension) Rules, 1992 in favour of the petitioner on such regularization of the services of the petitioner's husband within a stipulated time; And if the Opposite Parties do not show cause, then the Rule be made absolute by issuing
// 2 //
appropriate writ/writs and any other order as deem fit be passed; And for this act of kindness, petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray.”
4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that through highlighting his grievances, the petitioner has filed a representation vide Annexure-9 to the Writ Petition, but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, he prays that a direction be issued to the Opposite Party No.1 to take a decision on the above noted petition within a specific time period.
5. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs the Opposite Party No.1 to take a decision on the above noted representation in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to the petitioner.
6. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge Nitu Prava Digitally Signed Signed by: NITU PRAVA PRUSTY Reason: Authentication Location: OHC, Cuttack Date: 28-Aug-2026 16:48:33 Signature Not Verified