Orissa High Court

ABLAPL/9810/2026 of BABU NAYAK Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 27 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.9810 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010632102026 Babu Nayak … Petitioner Mr. S. K. Lenka, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. A . K. Pati, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 27.08.2026 01. 1. Heard learned

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No.9810 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010632102026

Babu Nayak

…

Petitioner

Mr. S. K. Lenka, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha

….

Opposite Party

Mr. A. K. Pati, ASC

CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

27.08.2026

01.

1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G.R. Case No.575 of 2026 pending on the file of learned J.M.F.C, Banpur arising out of Banpur P.S. Case No.289 of 2026 for commission of offences punishable under Sections 3(5) and 305(e) of BNS, 2023.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel that the Petitioner is not a named accused and he has been falsely implicated in the case at hand only because he is the owner of the vehicle in which the sand was allegedly being transported without permit.

And, it is also stated that the Petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent. Hence, he may be protected by pre-arrest bail.

4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for pre-arrest bail during currency of investigation.

5. Taking into account the nature of allegations and the punishment prescribed, this Court directs that on surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, the Petitioner shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just and proper subject to verification of criminal antecedent of similar nature.

If it comes to the fore that the Petitioner has any such criminal antecedent, this order shall not be given effect to.

6. It is needless to state that the Petitioner shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation.

7. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of.

(V. NARASINGH)

Judge Jina Digitally Signed Signed by: JINA DIGAL Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 28-Aug-2026 17:56:38 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead