Orissa High Court
WP(C)/21337/2026 of SUSHAMA KUJUR Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 27 August 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P. (C) No.21337 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010495522026 Sushama Kujur …. Petitioner None -versus- State of Odisha and another …. Opp. Parties Mr. Umesh Chandra Behura, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO Order No. ORDER 27.08.2026 (Hybrid
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P. (C) No.21337 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010495522026
Sushama Kujur
….
Petitioner
None
-versus-
State of Odisha and
another
….
Opp. Parties
Mr. Umesh Chandra Behura, AGA
CORAM:
JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
27.08.2026 (Hybrid Mode)
01.
1. The writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:
“The petitioner (Victim) therefore prays that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit this writ petition, issue notices calling upon the opp. Parties to show cause and after hearing the parties be pleased to direct the opp. Party No.1 to release/pay the victim compensation amount of Rs.1,00,000/- to the destitute, widow and Scheduled Tribe petitioner (Victim) in pursuance to the order vide Office of the opp. party No.2 i.e. the Collector & District Magistrate, Sundargarh Letter No. 1717/ST & SC Dev. dated 30.05.2026 vide Annexure-6 within a stipulated time for saving the destitute, widow and Scheduled Tribe petitioner (Victim) from further harassment and distress condition with starvation.
And / or pass any other order to which this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper to secure the ends of justice.
And for this act of your Lordships kindness, the petitioner (Victim) as in duty bound shall ever pray.”
2. The copy of the memo filed in the Registry on behalf of the petitioner singed by the learned counsel is received in Court which indicates thus:
“That, the present case is an infructuous. Hence, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be permitted the petitioner to withdraw the present writ petition.”
The memo is taken on record. Scanned copy be updated.
3. The learned Additional Government Advocate submits that he has no reservation if the writ petition is withdrawn.
4. The writ petition stands disposed of.
(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo) Judge
jyotsna Digitally Signed Signed by: JYOSTNARANI MAJHEE Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 29-Aug-2026 15:37:06 Signature Not Verified