Orissa High Court
CRLMC/1694/2026 of MANOJ KUMAR DEBATA Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 25 August 2026
of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMC No.1694 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010379332026 Manoj Kumar Debata ..... Appellant Represented by Adv. - Atmajit Manmith Das -versus- 1) STATE OF ODISHA ..... Respondents 2) REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, RTO 3) GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND 4) PRATEEK MISHRA 5)
Page 1 of 2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.1694 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010379332026
Manoj Kumar Debata
.....
Appellant
Represented by Adv. -
Atmajit Manmith Das
-versus-
1) STATE OF ODISHA
.....
Respondents
2) REGIONAL TRANSPORT
OFFICER, RTO
3) GOVERNMENT OF
NAGALAND
4) PRATEEK MISHRA
5) PRADIP MISHRA
Represented by Adv. -
RAJNISH KUMAR
KALAWATIA,
SWAPNIL ROY
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
25.08.2026 Order No.
03.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. Although an adjournment was sought for on behalf of Mr. Atmajit Manmith Das, learned counsel for the Petitioner, the same was objected to by the learned counsel appearing for the Opposite Party Nos. 4 and 5.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the Opposite Party Nos. 4 and 5 at the outset contended that no part of the cause of action arose in the State of Odisha and that the present case arises out of an FIR registered at Shakeshpeare Sarani P.S. Case No.157 dated 26.09.2025 for commission of offences punishable under Sections 61(2)/316(2)/318(4)/338/339/340(2)/351(2) of BNS
Page 2 of 2. and that the same corresponds to C.C. Case No.127 of 2025 pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Calcutta.
4. On a careful examination of the application filed by the Petitioner as well as the documents annexed thereto, this Court is of the considered view that the prayer made in the present application is not maintainable before this Court. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of by granting liberty to the Petitioner to approach the jurisdictional High Court for grant of necessary relief.
5. Accordingly, the CRLMC application stands disposed of.
( A.K. Mohapatra )
Judge
Sisir
Digitally Signed Signed by: SISIR KUMAR SETHI Designation: PERSONAL ASSISTANT Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT Date: 27-Aug-2026 16:22:18 Signature Not Verified