Orissa High Court

WP(C)/12006/2020 of BANSHIDHARA BEHERA Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 25 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.12006 of 2020 CNR No. ODHC010262372020 Bansidhara Behera & Ors. …. Petitioners Mr. N. Rath, Adv. appearing on behalf of Mr. C.S. Panda, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Panda, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.12006 of 2020

CNR No. ODHC010262372020

Bansidhara Behera &

Ors.

….

Petitioners

Mr. N. Rath, Adv. appearing on behalf of Mr. C.S. Panda, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha & Ors.

….

Opposite Parties

Mr. P.K. Panda, ASC

CORAM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

25.08.2026

11. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties.

3. Petitioners have filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased Admit the writ application, to issue rule Nisi calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why prayers made hereunder be not allowed, Upon showing insufficient cause/no cause make the said Rule absolute, Issue writ/ writs in nature of Mandamus directing Opposite parties to revise the seniority position of the petitioners as per the approved final select list and to grant them the promotional benefit in the post of OAS (Super time) Scale w.e.f. dtd. 31.07.2006 and O.A.S. (Senior Grade Supertime Scale) w.e.f. 12.10.2007 i.e. date their junior T.S.Chakravarty got such benefit with all service and

// 2 //

financial benefits and the Opp. Parties may be further directed to revise of their pension and other retirement benefits on the basis of such revised last pay to be arrived at and to sanction and release in their favour.

And/or may pass such other writ/writs, order/orders, direction/ directions as this Hon'ble Court may think fit and proper for the ends of justice.

And for this act of kindness the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.”.

4. Considering the submission made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, Petitioners are directed to make individual fresh representation before the Opposite Party No.1 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of their claim, if any, within a period of two (2) weeks hence.

5. It is observed that if such individual representation is filed within the aforesaid period, Opposite Party No.1 shall do well to dispose of the representation within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of such representations. The decision so taken by the Opposite Party No.1 be communicated to the Petitioners within that time.

6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Subrat

Judge Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBRAT KUMAR BARIK Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 28-Aug-2026 16:53:50 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead