Orissa High Court

WP(C)/16597/2026 of LALA DEBASIS RAY Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 25 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 16597 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010395202026 Lala Debasis Ray ..... Petitioner Mr. S.K. Dalai, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. A . Tripathy, AGA Mr. S. Rath, Advocate (Opp. Party Nos. 4 & 5) CORAM: THE

Page 1 of 2.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WP(C) No. 16597 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010395202026

Lala Debasis Ray

.....

Petitioner

Mr. S.K. Dalai, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha & Ors.

.....

Opposite Parties

Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA

Mr. S. Rath, Advocate

(Opp. Party Nos. 4 & 5)

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

25.08.2026 Order No. 02

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties.

3. Even though notice of the writ petition has been issued vide order dtd.26.05.2026, but in course of hearing learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner contended that he may be permitted to move Opp. Party No. 4 for consideration of his grievance as made in the writ petition.

4. Learned Addl. Govt. Advocate as well as learned counsel appearing for Opp. Party Nos. 4 & 5 have no serious objection to the course of action proposed by the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner.

5. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties and considering the submissions made, this Court while disposing the writ petition, permits the Petitioner to move Opp. Party No. 4 by filing an application within a period of three (3) weeks hence.

Page 2 of 2.

5.1. It is observed that if any such application is moved before Opp. Party No. 4 within the aforesaid time period, the said Opp. Party shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a further period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such application with due communication to the Petitioner.

6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY)

Judge Sneha Digitally Signed Signed by: SNEHANJALI PARIDA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 28-Aug-2026 11:57:24 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead